The South African
Military History Society

Die Suid-Afrikaanse Krygshistoriese Vereniging

Military History Journal
Vol 7 No 4 - December 1987

The Battle of the Nile - Circa 1190 B.C.

by I Cornelius

Most history books which refer to 'the Battle of the Nile', usually describe the battle that was fought in A.D. 1798. In that year Horatio Nelson, the hero of Trafalgar (1805) defeated the fleet of Napoleon at Aboukir Bay (near Alexandria).
However, centuries before, another battle was fought on the Nile; when the ships of pharaoh Ramses III repulsed a sea invasion by the 'Peoples of the Sea'. This battle has been described as 'the first naval battle in history'.

Historical Background

The so-called 'Peoples of the Sea' or 'Sea Peoples' were of mixed ethnicity and presumably originated from the Aegean Sea and islands such as Sardinia and Crete. They were known under such names as the Tjekker, Sherden (Sardinia) and the Philistines. In the 13th century B.C. they invaded the Middle East from the eastern Mediterranean, surging like a flood through Anatolia (Turkey), Syria and Palestine. Only the armies of the pharaohs succeeded in halting them at the eastern gates of Egypt. They also attacked from the west via Libya, but were consequently repulsed.

Map 1

During the reign of pharaoh Ramses III, a new threat developed. The first clash between the 'Sea Peoples' and the Egyptian forces took place on the Palestinian border. The invaders travelling with ox-drawn carts were overwhelmed by the Egyptians.
A more serious threat came from the sea, resulting in the real encounter. Three reasons can be given why the battle consequently took place.

(i) A group of 'Sea Peoples' infiltrated Egypt as pirates and were surprised and repulsed by the Egyptian forces.
(ii) A group of 'Sea Peoples' invaded Egypt from the sea and were met in battle by the Egyptian navy.
(iii) A 'Sea Peoples' naval contingent, accompanying the land forces made an attack on Egypt and met the Egyptians in battle as indicated in (ii) above.

There is sufficient evidence that the 'Sea Peoples' indulged in piracy. It seems, however, more justified to argue that the conflict that occurred was the result of an invasion from the land and the sea. Pirates usually attack at random and are not accompanied by land forces.
The historical situation can be reconstructed as follows: A group of ships of the 'Sea People' approached Egypt by one of the estuaries in the Nile delta. The Egyptians, forewarned of this, prepared a trap and consequently launched a surprise attack on the invaders. As will be shown below in the discussion of the non-written material, the 'Sea Peoples' were attacked before they could use their oars to escape.


The sources dealing with this naval battle are first of all epigraphic, the Egyptian royal inscriptions. However, these sources are highly idealized and stereotyped. Much more detailed information concerning this battle is supplied by artistic representation. The naval battle under discussion is depicted in sculptured relief on the walls of the famous temple at Medinet Habu in Egypt(2). This relief, which contains the first depiction of a full scale naval battle in world history, will serve as the main historical source in this short discussion (fig. 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1

The Battle

Ramses III boasts in his inscription: 'They cut off their land and were coming, their soul finished. They were warriors on land, another (group) was on the sea. Those who came on land were overthrown and killed.' This is an indication that one group of 'Sea Peoples' came by land but were defeated. Another group attacked Egypt from the sea, navigating the Nile.
Ramses III continues: 'Those who entered the river-mouths were like birds ensnared in the net...'
He prepared his ships: 'I have the river-mouths prepared like a strong wall, with warships, galleys and coasters, equipped, for they were manned completely from bow to stem with valiant warriors carrying their weapons'. As is to be seen in fig. 1, the battle raged on water, as well as on land. The visual representation depicts the battle on water, while on the right hand side archers are attacking from the land. The divine pharaoh is also visible (depicted as a giant), leading the attack on the notorious 'Sea Peoples'. It is of course not certain that he took part in the battle and the representation of his person is probably symbolic. This is reflected in verbatim: 'Those who came forward together on the sea, the full flame was in front of them at the river mouths, while a stockade of lances surrounded them on the shore...'
The textual evidence quoted so far provides only vague information concerning the battle. Much more detail can be obtained from the relief (fig. 1). The most important contribution that this relief presents is the temporal order of the naval battle. Fig. 2 contains a pictorial narrative of the battle in four stages:

Figure 2
Figure 2

(i) The commencement of the battle (E.l and N.l): the Egyptian ship is engaging the enemy. The invading vessel is still intact and level in the water. The Egyptians have just started their attack, throwing grappling hooks into the sail and boarding the enemy ship.
(ii) E.2 and N.2: the battle is proceeding. The mast and crow's nest are toppling down after having been pulled down (i). One Egyptian spears an enemy soldier and the Egyptian ship is already filled with enemy captives. It is interesting to note that the captives are watching the fight, so as to await the outcome (and their destiny).
(iii) The Egyptians are gaining the upper hand in the third stage (E.3 and N.3). The enemy vessel has capsized, with a broken mast and the invaders are flung into the water. The 'Sea Peoples' have been defeated and the Egyptians are the victors as can be seen by the prisoners in ship E.3.
(iv) With victory achieved, E.4 returns to the land, laden with prisoners. On the prow an Egyptian officer prepares to embark and to lead his prisoners before the pharaoh. Take note that ships E.1, E.2 and E.3 (in the attacking position) have the lion's head in front. E.4 is turned around because it is on a peaceful return mission.

The defeat was total. In fig. 1 some invaders try to reach the shores but are slaughtered by the Egyptian soldiers. On the two registers below the prisoners are led away while the royal attendants and bodyguards are visible on the right. This is complemented by the written sources: 'They were dragged in, enclosed, and prostrated on the beach, killed, and made into heaps from tail to head. Their ships and goods were as if fallen into the water'.
The detail concerning the ships and the fighters as depicted on the relief (fig. 1), needs more attention. Before proceeding, it has to be borne in mind that the depictions of the ships and fighters are highly typical and stylized. Only one type of ship is depicted and it is not certain that 'warships, galleys and coasters' took part as reflected by the text cited above. Nevertheless, from the depiction some knowledge can be obtained in connection with the ships used by the Egyptians and the 'Sea Peoples'. The same is true of the crews, who are typical, but reflect ethnicity and also information of the weapons used in combat.

The Ships(3)

Nine ships are shown in the relief (fig. 2), five belonging to the 'Sea Peoples' (N.l, N.2, N.3, N.4 and N.5) and four Egyptian ships (E.l, E.2, E.3 and E.4). Fig. 3 is a representation of an Egyptian ship that took part in the battle, supplying evidence concerning the appearance of the Egyptian warship during this period.

Figure 3
Figure 3

The crescent-shaped ship has a fore- and aft-castle. The bow in front ends in a lioness devouring an Asian. This prow did not serve as a ram, but was rather a piece of decoration, symbolizing the Egyptian king (in the form of a lion, the symbol of the goddess Sekhmet) destroying his enemy. The inscription has the entry: 'His majesty is like an enraged lion, attacking. ..' A ram would have been situated much lower on the prow below the water-line, so as to crush the timber of the enemy ship, causing a leak.
At the back a large oar is visible which is used as a rudder and is handled by a helmsman who steers the ship. The sails hoisted are to enable the fighters to engage in battle unobstructed. The ship is propelled by oarsmen with their oars. Due to the detail of the relief, the central mast, with a crow's nest, is also visible.
The ships of the 'Sea Peoples' (figs. 4 and 5) also have the fore- and aft mast and crow's nest. They also have their sails furled, but are powered only by sails, with no rowing oars which is unusual. The ships are directed by rear oars (in one case (see N.1 on fig. 2 and fig. 4) two oars are visible). The keel of the invader ship is curved, with a high stem and a prow ornamented by the head of a duck or bird.

Figure 4
Figure 4

The fighters and their weapons

The Egyptian crews are depicted in their usual dress - with wigs and linen kilts and clean shaven faces (fig. 3). The officer on E.4 (fig. 2) wears his ceremonial uniform. The Egyptians are brandishing clubs, handling spears, shooting with composite bows and arrows and defending themselves with shields.
The 'Sea Peoples' represent two ethnic groups: the Philistines, with their distinctive headdress, consisting of a cap with a horizontal band holding their hair up in the air (fig. 4)(4) and the Sherden (people from Sardinia) with their typical headdress, a helmet with horns (fig. 5). Philistines are aboard N.l, N.3 and N.5 (fig. 4) and Sherden aboard N.2 and N.4 (fig. 5). On their bodies they wear a panelled kilt, decorated with tassles. Their breasts are protected by strips of horizontal bands. They carry as weapons circular shields, spears and long straight swords.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Naval Battle Strategy

As mentioned previously, a double battle occurred. The Egyptians attacked over land and also by ship. While the naval battle raged, the archers on shore loosed a shower of arrows (fig.1) on the invaders.
The whole battle is typical of naval battles in the earlier periods(5), a fight between two parties of soldiers on board ships and not sailors engaging in battle. Soldiers are using weapons known to have been used in land battles and engaging in the usual way of hand to hand combat.
There are, however, some naval ingenuities. The Egyptians attacked from the decks of their ships after having blockaded the enemy vessels. No evidence is available that ramming occurred and led to N. 3 (fig. 2) capsizing.
The masts of the enemy ships crashed down on the decks, having been pulled down by the Egyptians. With their masts broken and the sails torn, the invaders were immobilized. This was also brought about by the fact that the invaders were surprised and could not start using their oars (or were the ships of the 'Sea Peoples' not supplied with oars but only propelled by sail). The oars handled by the rowers on the Egyptian vessels enabled the Egyptian fleet to manoeuvre their ships in the heat of battle to more appropriate positions. In contrast, the invaders remained stationary (their sails furled and without oars). This enabled the Egyptians to dictate the flow of the battle.
The Egyptians had a man in the crow's nest, presumably guiding the attackers. He could of course, also attack the enemy from this favourable height with a sling (this is well known from medieval naval battles).
To sum up: the Egyptians trapped the 'Sea Peoples' in the Nile delta, the sails of whose ships were furled. They grappled the invader ships, immobilizing them; soldiers boarded their ships and attacked the enemy whilst archers on shore supplied fire power. The use of archers (on sea and on land) provided long range fire power and helped the Egyptians to overwhelm the 'Sea Peoples'.


The question may be put of what historical value are these sources that have been used in the reconstruction of the battle? It is typical of the Egyptian pharaohs as presumed 'divine' kings, to boast and sometimes even to change near defeat into total victory.(6)
It is certain that a fight did occur on the Nile in the 12th century B.C.. The defeat was not so overwhelming as the Egyptian writers and artists wished it to be. The 'Sea Peoples' were defeated and repulsed, but not annihilated. They eventually settled in Palestine and one of the groups, the Philistines, were met by the people of Israel. In fact, they even eternalised their presence by giving this region the name by which it is known today (Palestine).
The naval battle described provides many facts concerning ships and naval strategy during this early period. 'The Battle of the Nile', fought in 1190 B.C. thus remains an unique event in the history of Egypt and also of war at sea!


  1. A Hittite tablet of Suppiluliuma II (c1380-1345 B.C.) (The Hittites established an empire in Anatolia that flourished until c1200 B.C.) refers to a maritime battle: 'The ship of Alashiya (= Cyprus) met me in the sea three times for battle, and I smote them; and I seized and set fire to them in the sea.' (Guterbock, 1967, 78). Naval activities are also dealt with in texts from Ras Shamra-Ugarit in Northern Syria (Cornelius, 1981, 24).
  2. For an artistic discussion of this relief see H.H. Nelson, 1943. A colour reproduction of the. naval battle relief is to be found in Yadin, 1963, 340-41.
  3. For a detailed reconstruction of the Egyptian and 'Sea Peoples' ships see respectively Landtrom, 1974, 111 - 113, and Wachsmann, 1981.
  4. This is not a headdress consisting of a band of feathers, (or reeds) as is usually stated in most history books (see Galling, 1969).
  5. Other examples can be found in Howarth, 1981, 8ff.
  6. Compare the battle of Kadesh (c1286 B.C.) between pharaoh Ramses II and the Hittite king Muwatallis which ended in a tie. The Egyptian chronicles describing this battle, describes the battle as if the pharaoh was the victor.

Sources of the Illustrations

Acknowledgement is given for permission granted by the publishers for the use of the following illustrations:
fig. 1. A. Erman & H. Ranke, Aegypten and aegyptisches Leben im Altertum, (Tubingen, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1923), p 648 (Abb 269).

fig. 2. H.H. Nelson, 'The Naval Battle Pictured at Medinet Habu', Journal of Near Eastern Studies, II/ 1, (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1943), pp 40-55, fig. 4.

fig. 3-5. Y. Yadin, The Art of Warfare in Biblical Lands in the Light of Archaeological Discovery, (London, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1963) pp 250-252.

All translations are taken from J.B. Pritchard (ed.), Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1969), pp 262, 263.


Return to Journal Index OR Society's Home page

South African Military History Society /